Result: Flat specimen surface with sink marks eliminated.

1. Debunking the Myth: Soft TPU Sink Marks Are Not Always "Rebound," But Often "Under-Feeding"
Many injection molding engineers instinctively attribute sink marks in soft materials to "excessive pressure causing elastic rebound," and thus try to reduce pressure. However, the real-world data from this case (where pressures were increased across the board) proves that: for thick-walled areas far from the gate, increasing late-stage injection and packing pressures is the correct solution for soft TPU sink marks. The core issue is insufficient packing compensation.
2. Core Mechanism: The Battle Between Remote Shrinkage and Packing Compensation
In simple, practical terms, the logic behind this sink mark is as follows:

Supplementary Root Cause: Due to the poor thermal conductivity of soft TPU, the outer skin cools and solidifies first, while the inner core remains hot and shrinks. This temperature gradient creates a larger internal volume deficit. If the external packing pressure is insufficient, the internal shrinkage pulls the solidified skin inward, forming a sink mark.
3. Parameter Adjustment Breakdown
Parameter Stage
Before Adjust
After Adjust
Process Function
2nd-stage Injection Pressure
35
38
Increases mid-stage filling density,reserving material for later compensation.
3rd-stage Injection Pressure
30
35
Increases late-stage filling pressure toovercome flow resistance and push materialto remote areas.
1st-stage Packing Pressure
30
35
Critical compensation phase before gatefreeze-off; uses high pressure to fill internalthermal shrinkage.
2nd-stage Packing Pressure
30
35
Maintains compaction to prevent meltbackflow before gate seal, ensuringsufficient remote feeding.
4. Practical Risks in Soft TPU Molding
Although increasing pressure solved the sink mark in this case, secondary issues caused by high pressure must be guarded against:

